A thing about a thing
Aug. 16th, 2018 02:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Herein I attempt to coherently express my enormous enthusiasm for a book and almost succeed: canlit.ca/article/the-engaged-classroom/. There's one particular sentence construction in there that I might term a doozy, but most of it seems to make some kind of sense.
I've enthused about Learn, Teach, Challenge here in the past, so this is more of that.
I no longer write many reviews for publication1 because of a) writing anxiety so monumental it is visible from space, and b) creeping jealousy that I am writing about the thing instead of writing the thing myself. However,2 attempting academic reviews once a year or so means that I tackle works of criticism I wouldn't otherwise have known about / organized myself to read. This is a lucky thing: free smart books and compulsory thinking time.
I'm just the worst, though, re: every cliche about academic writers -- always late and shimmering with insecurity.
I fell over several deadlines with this review, and wasn't satisfied with it even when I gave up and flung it at the editors, but I think they must have done some sort of editing magic, because now I kind of like it.
{rf}
1. Which is not to say that I ever wrote a lot of reviews, but I used to write them for the local paper and a local arts website.
2. In looking for some comparative readings on grammar, I was paging through an old Strunk & White and discovered that it advised against the above usage of "however." Wherefore? On the grounds that "however" should be understood as used in a phrase like "however they plan to accomplish the task."
However, it seems clear to me that the contemporary "however" is a contracted version of something like "however that may be" and therefore of perfectly reasonable lineage even if the older meaning remained central (which, however, it does not, at least not in North America).
I rehearse old grammar fights as some replay classic chess games.
I've enthused about Learn, Teach, Challenge here in the past, so this is more of that.
I no longer write many reviews for publication1 because of a) writing anxiety so monumental it is visible from space, and b) creeping jealousy that I am writing about the thing instead of writing the thing myself. However,2 attempting academic reviews once a year or so means that I tackle works of criticism I wouldn't otherwise have known about / organized myself to read. This is a lucky thing: free smart books and compulsory thinking time.
I'm just the worst, though, re: every cliche about academic writers -- always late and shimmering with insecurity.
I fell over several deadlines with this review, and wasn't satisfied with it even when I gave up and flung it at the editors, but I think they must have done some sort of editing magic, because now I kind of like it.
{rf}
1. Which is not to say that I ever wrote a lot of reviews, but I used to write them for the local paper and a local arts website.
2. In looking for some comparative readings on grammar, I was paging through an old Strunk & White and discovered that it advised against the above usage of "however." Wherefore? On the grounds that "however" should be understood as used in a phrase like "however they plan to accomplish the task."
However, it seems clear to me that the contemporary "however" is a contracted version of something like "however that may be" and therefore of perfectly reasonable lineage even if the older meaning remained central (which, however, it does not, at least not in North America).
I rehearse old grammar fights as some replay classic chess games.
no subject
Date: 2018-08-16 09:56 pm (UTC)"However" is here to stay, Strunk and White! Whereas your good selves have shuffled off this mortal coil!
Looking forward to looking at the book review later in the evening :-)
no subject
Date: 2018-08-16 10:04 pm (UTC)It comes across pretty enthusiastically to me.
no subject
Date: 2018-08-22 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-08-17 12:25 pm (UTC)